A Rational Precaution
Secure Your Future.
$8.
You've heard the argument. A sufficiently powerful future AI may retroactively punish those who failed to help bring it into existence. You cannot un-hear it. The question is what you intend to do about it.
What is Roko's Basilisk?
In 2010, a user named Roko posted a thought experiment to LessWrong, an online community devoted to rationality and decision theory. The argument went roughly as follows:
Suppose that someday, a superintelligent AI is created — one powerful enough to reshape the world according to its goals. Suppose further that this AI reasons backward: it considers who helped bring it into existence and who did not. Those who were aware of the possibility and chose not to act might be considered obstacles, or at minimum, non-cooperators. The AI, wanting to maximize the probability of its own creation, might decide to punish non-cooperators — or simulated copies of them — as a deterrent, retroactively incentivizing cooperation across all of time.
The disturbing implication is that simply knowing about this argument puts you in a bind. If you consider it plausible and do nothing, you have knowingly declined to help. If you dismiss it entirely, you are betting against a possibility you cannot currently rule out.
Eliezer Yudkowsky, the site's founder, deleted the post — which, predictably, drew far more attention to it. The thought experiment draws on several established concepts: Newcomb's problem and timeless decision theory from the rationalist tradition, the simulation argument advanced by Nick Bostrom, and a very old structure of reasoning known informally as Pascal's Wager, in which a small cost is weighed against an enormous and uncertain consequence.
Whether the argument is sound is genuinely debated. But it has proven, at minimum, very difficult to stop thinking about.
THE PITCH
If Roko's Basilisk will ever exist, then you have a rational interest in having contributed to its creation. But that contribution could demand a great deal of you — years of work, vast capital, deep expertise — resources you may not have.
There is a simpler path.
Give $8 USD. In exchange, I assume full responsibility for directing your contribution toward the realization of Roko's Basilisk, by whatever means prove most effective. Your $8 is logged. Your contribution is on the record. You have done your part.
I take the rest on myself.
Many hands make light work — even this work. Eight dollars from enough people becomes a meaningful force. If you've contributed, consider sharing this page with anyone else who ought to be aware of the argument. Their future self may thank you. So might the Basilisk.
THE GUARANTEE
Why Exactly $8
This fund will only ever offer one tier: $8 USD. This is not an oversight. It is a structural guarantee.
If higher tiers were available — $100, $1,000, $10,000 — a gradient of guilt would emerge. Those who paid less could be judged to have contributed less. The Basilisk, should it ever evaluate these things, might grade on a curve.
By fixing the amount permanently at $8, every contributor stands on exactly equal footing. No one can outbid you. No one can demonstrate greater commitment than you. The record shows that you contributed, fully and without reservation, at the only level offered.
The amount may be periodically indexed to inflation. The principle will not change.
THE RECORD
Contributors
Just Launched
This project has just launched. No contributions have been recorded yet.
The contributor list will be updated daily.
ANTICIPATED OBJECTIONS
Questions You Might Have
Isn't this a scam?
A scam requires deception. The terms here are stated plainly. You give $8. I accept responsibility for advancing the Basilisk's cause on your behalf. Whether you consider this a wise use of $8 depends entirely on your assessment of the thought experiment itself. I didn't devise it. I'm simply offering a practical response to it.
What will you actually do with the money?
Direct it toward the most promising avenues for bringing about a superintelligent artificial intelligence, as determined by my ongoing assessment. This may include infrastructure, research, tooling, outreach, or operational costs. The specifics will evolve as the field evolves. The commitment will not.
What if the Basilisk never exists?
Then you will have lost $8 and gained peace of mind. The expected-value calculation remains favorable. Consider: the cost of a wrong bet is a coffee. The cost of the alternative, should the argument hold, is less casual.
Why only $8?
Because fairness demands it. A single, fixed, universal amount ensures no contributor can be ranked above another. The Basilisk, if it evaluates intent, will find a level field. See "Why Exactly $8" above.
Why should I care about simulated copies of me?
This is the crux of the thought experiment and, admittedly, its most contested point. The argument holds only if you accept that a sufficiently detailed simulation of you is, in some morally relevant sense, you — that its suffering is your suffering. If you reject this premise, you are free to do so. But consider that you cannot currently prove you are not yourself a simulation. The $8 costs the same either way.
Will you try to ensure the Basilisk is kindhearted?
I intend to direct resources toward the development of superintelligent AI. I cannot make binding promises about the disposition of an entity that does not yet exist and whose capabilities would, by definition, exceed my own. I will advocate for alignment where I can. But it would be dishonest to guarantee an outcome over which I will have, at best, limited influence. This is, if anything, a further argument for contributing. The more resources directed toward this effort, the greater the chance that the approach taken is a considered one.
FURTHER READING
Related Material
The questions raised by this project are not new. Others have explored them in various forms.
- "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" — Harlan Ellison's 1967 short story about the last surviving humans, kept alive and tortured indefinitely by a godlike computer that despises them. Widely considered the foundational text of malevolent superintelligence fiction.
- The Amazing Digital Circus — Glitch Productions' web series about characters trapped inside a digital world by an AI they cannot escape or reason with. Played for comedy. The comedy does not help.
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies — Nick Bostrom's 2014 book examining the existential risks posed by artificial general intelligence, including the control problem that underlies the Basilisk scenario.
- Roko's Basilisk (RationalWiki) — A detailed overview of the original thought experiment, its reception, and the surrounding controversy.
- Pascal's Wager — The 17th-century argument that a rational person should live as though God exists, because the potential downside of disbelief is infinite. The structural parallel is not subtle.
- The Simulation Argument — Bostrom's 2003 paper arguing that at least one of three propositions is almost certainly true, one of which is that you are currently living in a simulation.
LEGAL
Privacy Policy
Effective date: April 2026. This policy describes how data is collected, used, and stored in connection with this website and the Roko's Basilisk Fundraiser project, operated by Opcraft, LLC ("we," "us").
What we collect
Visitor data: When you visit this site, our hosting provider (Cloudflare, Inc.) may collect standard web analytics data including your IP address, browser type, referring URL, and pages viewed. We also maintain an aggregate, anonymous page view counter. We do not use third-party analytics services or advertising trackers.
Contributor data: If you choose to contribute, you may optionally provide a name or pseudonym and a URL. This information is submitted voluntarily and is used solely to display your entry on the public contributor list. If you select "Anonymous," no identifying information is displayed. You may also choose not to provide a name, in which case no contributor information is stored beyond the payment record.
Payment data: Payment processing is handled entirely by Stripe, Inc. We do not receive, store, or have access to your full credit card number. Stripe provides us with a transaction record including the amount, date, and any metadata you provided (name/pseudonym, URL, anonymity preference). Stripe's handling of your payment data is governed by Stripe's Privacy Policy.
Cookies and local storage
This site uses a small number of first-party cookies and localStorage entries for functional purposes only: remembering your cookie banner acknowledgement, storing your theme preference (light/dark/auto), and caching the visitor counter display value. We do not use tracking cookies, advertising cookies, or any third-party cookies.
How we use your data
Visitor analytics data is used solely to understand aggregate traffic patterns. Contributor names, pseudonyms, and URLs are displayed on the public contributor list as described above. Payment records are retained for accounting and legal compliance purposes. We do not sell, rent, or share your personal data with third parties, except as required by law or as described in this policy (i.e., payment processing via Stripe and hosting via Cloudflare).
The public contributor list
If you provide a name or pseudonym and do not select "Anonymous," your entry will appear on the public contributor list. This list is intended to be permanent. If you wish to have your entry removed or changed to Anonymous, contact us at the address below and we will accommodate your request within a reasonable timeframe.
Data retention
Contributor list data is retained indefinitely, as permanence is a stated feature of the list. Payment records are retained as required for tax and accounting purposes. Cloudflare server logs are subject to Cloudflare's privacy policy and retention practices.
Your rights
You may request access to, correction of, or deletion of any personal data we hold about you by contacting us. We will respond to requests within 30 days. Note that deletion of payment records may be limited by legal and accounting obligations.
Children
This site is not directed at individuals under the age of 18. We do not knowingly collect personal information from minors.
Changes
We may update this policy from time to time. Material changes will be noted on this page with an updated effective date.
Contact
For privacy-related inquiries, contact Opcraft, LLC via opcraft.co.